Monsanto était bien responsable de l’intoxication de l’agriculteur charentais Paul François


Monsanto condamné. Les Verts saluent « une très bonne nouvelle
fév 13, 2012

La rédaction

Le tribunal de grande instance de Lyon a déclaré aujourd’hui 13 février que la multinationale Monsanto était bien responsable de l’intoxication de l’agriculteur charentais Paul François, qui avait utilisé le Lasso, un herbicide appartenant à la firme. Cette dernière devra indemniser l’agriculteur de la totalité de son préjudice, une première en France. La porte-parole d’Eva Joly Michèle Rivasi réagit au verdict.

« C’est une très bonne nouvelle et une belle victoire, en attendant que Monsanto fasse appel. Comme Paul François, de nombreux agriculteurs manipulent quotidiennement des produits extrêmement nocifs pour la santé et déclarent par la suite des maladies neurologiques qui peuvent dans certains cas s’avérer très graves. Nous avons pu le constater avec Eva Joly, lorsque nous avons rencontré cet agriculteur en Alsace atteint de la maladie de Parkinson. Alors qu’il est désormais impossible de nier l’impact sanitaire de l’utilisation de tels poisons, il est scandaleux de mettre tant d’obstacles aux agriculteurs et à la reconnaissance de leurs maladies en tant que maladies professionnelles. »


UPDATE 2-Monsanto guilty of chemical poisoning in France

* Case against Monsanto 1st such claim to reach French court

* Monsanto lawyer says "disappointed", envisages appeal

* Pesticide makers see no evidence of major health risk

By Catherine Lagrange and Marion Douet

LYON/PARIS, Feb 13 (Reuters) - A French court on Monday declared U.S. biotech giant Monsanto guilty of chemical poisoning of a French farmer, a judgment that could lend weight to other health claims against pesticides.

In the first such case heard in court in France, grain grower Paul Francois, 47, says he suffered neurological problems including memory loss, headaches and stammering after inhaling Monsanto's Lasso weedkiller in 2004.

He blames the agri-business giant for not providing adequate warnings on the product label.

The ruling was given by a court in Lyon, southeast France, which ordered an expert opinion of Francois's losses to establish the amount of damages.

"It is a historic decision in so far as it is the first time that a (pesticide) maker is found guilty of such a poisoning," François Lafforgue, Francois's lawyer, told Reuters.

Monsanto said it was disappointed by the ruling and would examine whether to appeal the judgment.

"Monsanto always considered that there were not sufficient elements to establish a causal relationship between Paul Francois's symptoms and a potential poisoning," the company's lawyer, Jean-Philippe Delsart, said.

Previous health claims from farmers have foundered because of the difficulty of establishing clear links between illnesses and exposure to pesticides.

Francois and other farmers suffering from illness set up an association last year to make a case that their health problems should be linked to their use of crop protection products.

The agricultural branch of the French social security system says that since 1996, it has gathered farmers' reports of sickness potentially related to pesticides, with about 200 alerts a year.

But only about 47 cases have been recognised as due to pesticides in the past 10 years. Francois, who suffers from neurological problems, obtained work invalidity status only after a court appeal.


The Francois case goes back to a period of intensive use of crop-protection chemicals in the European Union. The EU and its member countries have since banned a large number of substances considered dangerous.

Monsanto's Lasso was banned in France in 2007 following an EU directive after the product had already been withdrawn in some other countries.

France, the EU's largest agricultural producer, is now targetting a 50 percent reduction in pesticide use between 2008 and 2018, with initial results showing a 4 percent cut in farm and non-farm use in 2008-2010.

The Francois claim may be easier to argue than others because he can pinpoint a specific incident - inhaling the Lasso when cleaning the tank of his crop sprayer - whereas fellow farmers are trying to show accumulated effects from various products.

"It's like lying on a bed of thorns and trying to say which one cut you," said a farmer, who has recovered from prostate cancer and asked not to be named.

The French association of crop protection companies, UIPP, says pesticides are all subject to testing and that any evidence of a cancer risk in humans leads to withdrawal of productsfrom the market.

"I think if we had a major health problem with pesticides, we would have already known about it," Jean-Charles Bocquet, UIPP's managing director, said.

The social security's farming branch this year is due to add Parkinson's disease to its list of conditions related to pesticide use after already recognising some cases of blood cancers and bladder and respiratory problems.

France's health and environment safety agency (ANSES), meanwhile, is conducting a study on farmers' health, with results expected next year.

Plain text

  • Aucune balise HTML autorisée.
  • Les adresses de pages web et de courriels sont transformées en liens automatiquement.
  • Les lignes et les paragraphes vont à la ligne automatiquement.